Building Information Modelling has advanced significantly over the last decade, yet many organisations continue to rely on approaches shaped during the early days of BIM adoption. While BIM 2.0 is now firmly established, large parts of the industry remain tied to outdated digital construction practices that limit project performance, data quality and collaboration.
Data-centric
BIM 2.0 represents a shift towards data-centric project delivery. It places information management at the centre of design, construction and operations, supported by connected workflows, open standards and integrated platforms. In contrast, BIM 1.0 was often defined by the adoption of 3D modelling tools without fully embedding information requirements, structured data processes or collaborative decision-making. This gap between capability and practice has become increasingly visible as project demands grow more complex and clients request reliable, interoperable data.
Digital construction process
Many organisations still approach BIM as a modelling exercise rather than a digital construction process. Models are delivered, but asset information requirements remain unclear, naming conventions vary, and datasets are exported in unstructured formats. These habits reflect a period when BIM compliance was driven by the need to meet early mandates rather than to support long-term asset value. As a result, workflows built for 2015 no longer align with current expectations around data-driven construction and integrated project delivery using BIM.
Data exchange
The transition to BIM 2.0 calls for stronger links between project teams, clearer definitions of information needs and greater accountability around data exchange. Common Data Environments are now expected to support real-time collaboration, structured metadata and traceable audit trails. Open standards such as IFC and ISO 19650 form the basis of modern information management in construction, yet adoption remains inconsistent. Many practices continue to rely on local file-based working, duplicated datasets and siloed decision-making, all of which make coordination harder and increase the risk of errors.
Asset performance
Companies are increasingly seeking clarity on how digital information supports asset performance. BIM 2.0 responds by ensuring that project data is created, validated and handed over in formats that integrate with asset management systems. Practices that maintain older workflows often struggle to meet these expectations, leading to rework late in the project lifecycle. The shift towards structured, reliable and interoperable data is becoming a key factor in procurement decisions, particularly across infrastructure, housing and public sector projects.
The industry is also seeing a rise in automation, data analytics and digital twins. These technologies rely on consistent, high-quality information flows. Without the foundations of BIM 2.0 workflows, organisations find it difficult to integrate new digital construction technologies or scale them across portfolios. The result is a widening gap between early adopters and organisations slow to evolve their processes.
Effective digital construction
Moving forward, the sector will need to reassess how BIM is embedded within everyday project delivery. This includes investment in skills, transparent information requirements, and adoption of open, connected platforms that support true lifecycle data management. BIM 2.0 is not a future aspiration; it is the current standard for effective digital construction. The organisations that recognise this shift and update their workflows accordingly will be best placed to meet client expectations, manage project risk and support long-term asset value in a rapidly changing built environment.
Read next: Cutting building-sector emissions after COP30 – Build in Digital
Are you a building professional? Sign up for a FREE MEMBERSHIP to upload news stories, post job vacancies, and connect with colleagues on our secure social feed.
