Home » NFB responds to the latest NPPF review

NFB responds to the latest NPPF review

by Simon Foulds

The Government’s latest National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) review represents a significant moment for the UK planning system, housing delivery, and the digital construction sector. Positioned as a package of reforms to unblock development, the proposals aim to speed up decision-making, improve viability for smaller sites, and rebalance environmental policy to better reflect delivery realities. For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which play a critical role in housing supply, the review signals renewed attention after years of structural disadvantage within the planning system.

Central to the NPPF review is a commitment to making planning more predictable and rules based. Measures include allocating additional funding to local planning authorities (LPAs) to accelerate application processing, particularly where major housing schemes are stalled. At the same time, the Government proposes to reduce the role of planning committees for smaller developments, transferring decision-making authority to professional planners acting in line with adopted local plans. For digital construction professionals, these reforms have implications for programme certainty, data-led planning workflows, and early-stage design investment.

Consultations welcomed

Richard Beresford, Chief Executive of the National Federation of Builders (NFB), welcomed the renewed focus on SMEs and continuity with earlier consultations. He said: “We thank the Government for again listening to the industry on calls to review the NPPF and help small and medium sized housebuilders. Since the first NPPF review, a working paper to define Medium sized sites of between 10 and 49 homes was released and policies to assist SMEs have been consulted on. This review is therefore a key moment to bring previous consultations together and embed them in national planning policy.”

One of the most impactful proposals for SME developers is the potential exemption from the Building Safety Levy for sites delivering between 10 and 49 homes. This aligns with the NFB’s long-standing call to formally recognise medium-sized sites within national policy. Reducing levy exposure at this scale could materially improve scheme viability, especially when combined with proposals to allow higher-density development for SMEs. From a digital construction perspective, improved certainty at this scale supports investment in building information modelling (BIM), digital cost planning, and modern methods of construction (MMC).

LPAs

The review also proposes a national pattern book of standard housing designs, developed in collaboration with LPAs. If implemented effectively, this could reduce planning risk and enable greater use of platform-based design, component standardisation, and offsite manufacturing. For construction technology providers and SME builders alike, pattern books could underpin repeatable digital workflows, enabling productivity gains while remaining compliant with local design codes.

Environmental policy reform is another key feature. The Government has proposed Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) exemptions for smaller sites below 0.2 hectares, alongside a consultation on a brownfield-specific exemption up to 2.5 hectares. Additional commitments include simplifying offsite BNG requirements for medium-sized developments and clarifying approaches for nationally significant infrastructure projects. Collectively, these measures aim to reduce complexity while maintaining environmental intent.

Necessary correction

Rico Wojtulewicz, Head of Policy and Market Insight at the NFB, described the review as a necessary correction. He said: “The 2024 NPPF review unpicked the last Government’s housing blocking policies and added vital reforms to deliver for large sites and infrastructure. However, it missed a chance to focus on SMEs which is why this subsequent review was needed. This NPPF review gives us an opportunity to realign the planning cogs and make planning policy more predictable and coherent.”

Wojtulewicz also highlighted progress on the Building Safety Levy threshold, adding: “As well as the Government listening to our recommendations for another NPPF review, we thank them for accepting our recommendation to increase the Building Safety Levy (BSL) exemption threshold to 50 homes.”

BNG framework

However, concerns remain around the effectiveness of the current BNG framework. While exemptions may ease pressure on smaller schemes, the underlying methodology continues to draw criticism. Wojtulewicz argued that a habitat-based metric fails to reflect real ecological outcomes, stating: “The reforms announced on Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) are welcomed and will help small projects, but the policy is still broken. For as long as it remains based on broad habitats and not ecosystems, it will continue to make projects unviable, while not doing enough for wildlife.”

He continued by calling for practical, onsite biodiversity measures to be recognised within the BNG calculator, including species-specific interventions and lighting strategies that support food chains. This debate is highly relevant to digital construction, where data-driven environmental modelling and asset-level biodiversity tracking could support more nuanced policy approaches.

Beyond environmental reform, the NPPF review includes funding to expand the Small Sites Aggregator programme, with plans to bring 60 brownfield sites into social housing delivery. Concentrated initially in key cities, this initiative could demonstrate how digital land identification, site aggregation, and MMC can accelerate regeneration while supporting SME participation.

Prioritises delivery

Taken together, the NPPF review reflects a shift towards planning reform that prioritises delivery certainty, proportional regulation, and digital-enabled efficiency. For the digital construction sector, the reforms present both opportunity and responsibility: opportunity to scale innovation across smaller sites, and responsibility to evidence how technology can support faster, greener, and more predictable housing delivery.

If implemented coherently, the NPPF review could align planning reform, digital construction, SME viability, and biodiversity outcomes, creating a more predictable system capable of delivering homes, infrastructure, and environmental recovery together.


Read next: Government to reform the NPPF – Build in Digital

Are you a building professional? Sign up for a FREE MEMBERSHIP to upload news stories, post job vacancies, and connect with colleagues on our secure social feed.

Leave a Comment

Related News

Online building news, features and opinions

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More